Legal Analysis of the Implementation of Government Regulation Number 10 of 1983 in conjunction with Government Regulation Number 45 of 1990 on Divorce Permits for Government Employees with Employment Agreements (PPPK) in Religious Courts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58764/j.im.2026.7.163Keywords:
divorce permit, PPPK, religious courts, legal certainty, state administrative law, qualitative researchAbstract
Divorce for Government Employees with Employment Agreements (PPPK) often faces controversy regarding the requirement for a superior's permission letter, although this is not explicitly regulated in national legislation. This study aims to identify and analyze the existence of a superior's permission letter for PPPK in divorce cases and to analyze judges' perspectives on the application of this requirement at the Panyabungan Class II Religious Court. This study used qualitative methods with a field research approach. Primary data were collected through in-depth interviews with five judges (including Chief Justice Dr. Mirwan), court clerks, registration officers, and eighteen PPPK litigants. Secondary data were obtained from official documents such as Chief Justice's Decrees, service brochures, case summaries, and related regulations. Data analysis was conducted using data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion-drawing techniques, while data validity was ensured through source triangulation. The results indicate that court policy requires a superior's permission letter for PPPK at the registration stage as an administrative requirement. However, in court practice, the majority of judges do not consider this a barrier. Of the 18 PPPK cases from 2021 to September 11, 2025, only one case involved a judge actively requesting a permit. There is a sharp difference in the judges' perspectives between the analogy with civil servants and the principle of public welfare versus the principle of legality and the protection of individual civil rights. Normatively, a permit for PPPK is merely an internal administrative policy that is not binding as a legal or formal requirement for litigation. This finding reveals a lack of synchronization between policy and practice, as well as potential legal uncertainty. The study recommends the establishment of clear and uniform national regulations to balance the orderliness of civil servant administration with the right of access to justice for PPPK.
Downloads
References
» click to expand references listAl-Baijarami. (n.d.). Hasyiyah al-Baijarami 'ala al-Khatib, Juz 4. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Suyuti. (n.d.). Al-Asybah wa al-Naza'ir. Kairo: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-Utsaimin, S. M. (2012). Shahih Fiqih Wanita. Jakarta: Akbar Media.
Andriyaldi, A., Nisa, A., Afifi, A. A., & Hamdani, H. (2024). Syarat Wajib Saksi dalam Perceraian dalam Tinjauan Maqashid Syariah, Mempertimbangkan Pandangan Fuqaha dan Mufassir. AL-IMAM: Journal on Islamic Studies, Civilization and Learning Societies, 5(2), 93–100.
Anwar, M. (1991). Hukum Perkawinan dalam Islam: Kajian Fiqh dan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Arifin, H. B., & Abbas, A. F. (2007). Masa lampau yang belum selesai: percikan pikiran tentang hukum dan pelaksanaan hukum. (No Title).
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. London/Washington: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Az-Zuhaili, W. (1986). Usul al-Fiqh al-Islami, Jil. II. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr.
Az-Zuhaili, W. (1989). Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu, Juz 7. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr.
Dagun, S. M. (2013). Psikologi Keluarga. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Eliza, M. (2009). Pelanggaran Terhadap UU Perkawinan dan Akibat Hukumnya. Ciputat: Adelina Bersaudara.
Erwin, M. (2012). Filsafat Hukum Refleksi Kritis Terhadap Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Rajawali.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Ghozali, A. R. (2008). Fiqh Munakahat. Jakarta: Kencana.
Hadikusuma, H. (2003). Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia Menurut Perundangan, Hukum Agama dan Adat. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Handayaningrat. (1999). Administrasi Pemerintahan Dalam Pembangunan Nasional. Jakarta: Gunung Agung.
Handrianto, B. (2022). Cerai Pintu Darurat Pernikahan. Depok: Gema Insani.
Harahap, M. Y. (2017). Hukum acara perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hartini, S. (2004). Diktat Hukum Kepegawaian. Purwokerto: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jendral Soedirman.
Hasan, S. (2018). Hukum Keluarga dalam Islam. Malang: Setara Press.
Ibnu ‘Asyur, M. al-T. (2006). Al-tahrir wa al-tanwir (terj. Maqasid al-Shari‘ah al-Islamiyyah). Tunis: Dar al-Fikr al-Tunisiyy.
Jamaluddin. (2010). Hukum Perceraian (dalam Pendekatan Empiris). [Kota Penerbit]: [Nama] Press. (Silakan lengkapi bagian ini)
Majah, I. (2007). Sunnan Ibnu Majah, Juz I. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr.
Manan, B. (2009). Menegakan Hukum Suatu Pencarian. Jakarta: Asosiasi Advokat Indonesia.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Penemuan hukum (sebuah pengantar). Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Munawwir, A. W. (1997). Kamus al-Munawwir: Arab-Indonesia terlengkap. Surabaya: Pustaka Progressif.
Naily, N., Nadhifah, N. A., Rohman, H., & Amin, M. (2019). Hukum Perkawinan Islam Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Susanti, M., Silvianetri, S., Elimartati, E., Atsani, U., Nofialdi, N., & Yunarti, S. (2026). Dilema Administrasi dan Agama: Implementasi SPTJM di Jantung Minangkabau (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Harau). AL-IMAM: Journal on Islamic Studies, Civilization and Learning Societies, 7(1), 253–261.
Downloads
-
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
views: 0
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Efri Refiman, Zulkifli Zulkifli, Sri Yunarti, Elimartati Elimartati, Nofialdi Nofialdi


