Humanitarian and Beyond States Diplomacy: Society as an Emerging Global Actor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58764/j.prwkl.2025.3.102Keywords:
civil society, non-state actors, humanitarian diplomacy, ethical advocacy, global governanceAbstract
The evolution of global interaction in the 21st century reveals a widening gap between the complexity of contemporary crises and the capacity of traditional political diplomacy to address them. Geopolitical rivalries, institutional stagnation, and resource-extractive economic models have created a climate of diplomatic fatigue, where state-centered responses often fall short of delivering timely or humane solutions. Within this vacuum, civil society has emerged as a dynamic and influential actor capable of reshaping global engagement. Humanitarian organizations, volunteer networks, faith-based groups, and transnational advocacy coalitions now mobilize across borders to address urgent human needs, challenge injustices, and promote shared ethical norms. This paper conceptualizes “humanitarian and beyond-states diplomacy” as an alternative paradigm in which diplomatic influence is exercised not only through formal institutions but through societal initiative, moral persuasion, and collective action. It examines how civil society has moved from the periphery to the center of global affairs by negotiating humanitarian access, advocating for vulnerable populations, and generating new norms of solidarity and responsibility. Rather than operating within the limits of state sovereignty or economic interest, these actors draw legitimacy from empathy, global citizenship, and the moral urgency of human protection. The study argues that humanitarian diplomacy from below offers a transformative approach to international cooperation, one capable of renewing compassion, rebuilding trust, and addressing crises that have outpaced traditional diplomatic mechanisms. By analyzing this shift, the paper underscores the rising significance of society as an emerging global actor and highlights the potential of humanitarian engagement to redefine the future of diplomacy.
References
» click to expand references listAbbas, A. F., Eliza, M., & Afifi, A. A. (2024). Worldview Islam dan Sikap Moderasi Muhammadiyah: Dari Dinamika Bermazhab dan Kemajuan Bermanhaj. Perwakilan: Journal of Good Governance, Diplomacy, Customary Institutionalization and Social Networks, 2(2), 49-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58764/j.prwkl.2024.2.83
Abdul Aziz, A. H. Bin, Zhang, W., Hamid, B. A., Mahomed, Z., Bouheraoua, S., Kasri, N. S., & Sano, M. A.-A. (2019). Maximizing Social Impact Through Waqf Solutions. Malaysia: Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
Afifi, A. A. (2024). Islamic Moral Ethics: The Foundations for Good Governance, Management, and Civilizational Advancement. Perwakilan: Journal of Good Governance, Diplomacy, Customary Institutionalization and Social Networks, 2, 65-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58764/j.prwkl.2024.2.84
Afifi, A. A., & Abbas, A. F. (2023). Islam, Wacana Negara dan Geliat Politik di Indonesia. Perwakilan: Journal of Good Governance, Diplomacy, Customary Institutionalization and Social Networks, 1, 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58764/j.prwkl.2023.1.37
Afifi, A. A., Adrian, H., Azami, E., & Farid, M. (2024). Re-Viewing Sumitro's Policy and Industrial Maturity: Powering Downstream and Manufacturing Industries for Economic Growth and Sustainable Society. Journal of Regional Development and Technology Initiatives, 2, 79-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58764/j.jrdti.2024.2.79
Afifi, A. A., Andriyaldi, A., & Adrian, H. (2024). Reconstructing the Concept of Bela Negara: From Excessive Jargon to an Empirical Civic-based Approach. Perwakilan: Journal of Good Governance, Diplomacy, Customary Institutionalization and Social Networks, 2(2), 81-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58764/j.prwkl.2024.2.85
Anheier, H. K., & Toepler, S. (2009). International encyclopedia of civil society. Springer Science & Business Media. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4
Anwar, S., Wahid, S. A., Ilyas, H., Azhar, M., Supriatna, Jandra, M., ... Dahwan. (2006). Fikih Anti Korupsi: Perspektif Ulama Muhammadiyah. Jakarta: Majelis Tarjih dan Tajdid PP Muhammadiyah.
Azra, A., Abbas, A. F., Muqoddas, B., Abbas, N., Sarwono, S. W., Kuswaya, A., ... Anam, A. S. (2017). Reformulasi ajaran Islam: jihad, khilafah, dan terorisme (M. A. Darraz, ed.). Kerja sama Maarif Institute for Culture and Humanity [dan] Mizan.
Barnett, M. (2011). Empire of humanity: A history of humanitarianism. In Empire of Humanity. Cornell University Press.
Barnett, M., & Weiss, T. G. (2018). Humanitarianism in question: Politics, power, ethics. Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801461538
Berridge, G. R. (2022). Diplomacy: theory and practice. Springer Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85931-2
Boisot, M. (2006). Moving to the edge of chaos: bureaucracy, IT and the challenge of complexity. Journal of Information Technology, 21(4), 239-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000079
Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. OUP Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionsmsh.10551
Chirzin, M. H. (2000). The development of civil society in Indonesia and the role of voluntary organizations. American Journal of Islam and Society, 17(1), 21-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v17i1.2072
Clark, A. M. (1995). Non-governmental organizations and their influence on international society. Journal of International Affairs, 507-525.
Diamond, L., & McDonald, J. W. (1996). Multi-track diplomacy: A systems approach to peace.
Dix, S., Hussmann, K., & Walton, G. (2012). Risks of corruption to state legitimacy and stability in fragile situations. U4 Issue, 2012(3).
Douzinas, C. (2007). Human rights and empire: the political philosophy of cosmopolitanism. Routledge-Cavendish. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203945117
Fassin, D. (2011). Humanitarian reason: A moral history of the present. Univ of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520950481
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887-917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
Fitri, D. R., Afifi, A. A., & Abbas, A. F. (2022). Pemikiran Neo-modernisme dalam Hubungan Agama dan Negara di Indonesia: Studi Komparatif Pemikiran Nurcholish Madjid Dan Abdurrahman Wahid. AL-IMAM: Journal on Islamic Studies, Civilization and Learning Societies, 3, 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58764/j.im.2022.3.9
Fuad, M. (2002). Civil society in Indonesia: the potential and limits of Muhammadiyah. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 133-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/SJ17-2A
Held, D., & McGrew, A. G. (2007). Globalization theory: Approaches and controversies (Vol. 4). Polity Cambridge.
Hocking, B., Melissen, J., Riordan, S., & Sharp, P. (2012). Futures for diplomacy: Integrative diplomacy in the 21st century.
Kaldor, M. (2020). Global civil society: An answer to war. In The New Social Theory Reader (pp. 252-259). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060963-41
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. A. (2014). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801471292
Keohane, R. O., & Nye Jr, J. S. (1972). Transnational relations and world politics. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674593152
Kurniawan, D., & Afifi, A. A. (2023). Penguatan Moderasi Beragama Sebagai Solusi Menyikapi Politik Identitas. AL-IMAM: Journal on Islamic Studies, Civilization and Learning Societies, 4, 13-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58764/j.im.2023.4.30
Melissen, J. (2005). The new public diplomacy. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931
Montville, J. V. (2006). Track two diplomacy: The work of healing history. Whitehead J. Dipl. & Int'l Rel., 7, 15.
Mulalic, M. (2014). Fostering of Civil Society by Muslim Women's NGOs in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 34(4), 438-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2014.984905
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public affairs.
Riordan, S. (2008). The new international security agenda and the practice of diplomacy. In Global Governance and Diplomacy: Worlds Apart? (pp. 135-144). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227422_9
Rosenau, J. N., & Czempiel, E.-O. (1992). Governance without government: order and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521775
Slim, H. (2016). Humanitarian Ethics: A Guide to the Morality of Aid in War and Disaster. International Review of the Red Cross, 97(897/898), 469-475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383115000624
Smith, H. A., & Minear, L. (2007). Humanitarian diplomacy: Practitioners and their craft. United Nations University Press (UNU Press).
Weiss, T. G. (2013). Humanitarian business. John Wiley & Sons.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764
Downloads
-
PDF
views: 203
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdullah A Afifi; Syarif Al-Hadrami, Mona Eliza

